-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The committee idea is a good one. I've been out of the loop..been out of town and involved in 50 million other things lately.. moving out of state is hard! I think we should allow for volunteering. If the project grew to, say, 100+ devs, then elections would be in order but with this small group there are barely enough active people to cover the spots listed. As for me, I've got a couple of side projects going to help me get up to speed on QT4/KDE4 coding. I haven't messed with them and need to get my chops up a bit before I actually *change* anything, haha. Therefore, I volunteer for the Intern/Gopher position (not listed). - --Glen Jason Lucas wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 14:55 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: >> While I oppose a centralized command structure for the project because >> it really isn't needed. There is a need for technical committees for the >> two fairly distinct families of developers who are coming to ketechlab. >> I, and the new guy are mostly analog guys, while others on this list are >> mostly interested in the digital side. > > Well, as I am still (technically & financially) in charge of this > project, I'd better have my say. > I agree that we need to have a more formal structure to the project and > I think that we could achieve this by having A committee. It would be > wrong to split the project into two separate camps (analogue and > digital) at this stage for the following two main reasons: > > a) All digital components are made from analogue devices - it should > (theoretically) be possible to model any digital component using > analogue components within KTechLab (think TTL, CMOS) i.e the separation > is between analogue & digital is a fallacy. > > b) The project is simply too small to support sub-committees at the > moment. > > That said, there is still obviously some division between those of you > that are mainly interested in analogue and those in digital. > (As a hobbyist in robotics, I'm interested in both) > > I propose that we have a core committee that represents of the main > interests of the project: > > Chairman - The Project Leader > Treasurer - Project finances (well, we live in hope!) > Lead Developer (Analogue) > Lead Developer (Digital) > Web/Wiki Lead Developer > GUI Lead Developer > Translation > PR/Promotion > Education > > > First item on the committee agenda: > > Who wants to do what?, or should we hold an election of some kind? > > > Jason. > Project Manager > (And yes, I've served on several local committees over the years!) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Ktechlab-devel mailing list > Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkk9JecACgkQLstl3vProOCjmwCdFKPh2wipV1D1819IIC78PZfg elwAn3dMiWQE+W7Fjs79Bp67adUWk0dy =p2iW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel