Zoltan Padrah wrote: > Hi, > > before actually starting to fill the code with smart pointers, I want > to start a discussion about it. > > As I remember, Alan used to say that he doesn't like smart pointers, > because they show that the code that uses them is not well thought-out > (feel free to correct me...). > > My current opinion is that my time is limited, so I want to get done > as much as I can in a given time. So I prefer to use solutions that > will work reliably and are simple and fast to implement, instead of > analyzing a codebase for hours. So I prefer to use smart pointers, > which can save me a lot of time and effort. Of course I don't want to > over-use them, but I think they are a good pragmatic approach for > fixing memory-handling related issues. > > What is your opinion?
Yeah, we are trying to re-bootstrap the project so I would tend to say OK to smart pointers... Naturally, i'll treat them like TODO issues. ;) -- IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. Powers are not rights. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
