I think you should name it Ktechlab4-0.0.x and increment with minor and major releases.
Ketechlab4 will denote the KDE version and as per usual the first number will denote a major release, 2nd a major update and the third a minor update. At least that's how I seem to remember the numbering scheme. 0.4 is a project that hasn't reached a maturity for a 1.x numbering. I think that's how the linux kernel is numbered, but it is many, many years since I read about it. That's my two cents. Kind regards, Claus -------------------------------------------------------------- umount /dev/vodka && eject /dev/stomach -Mplayer crew Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:27:00 +0300 From: zoltan.pad...@gmail.com To: ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Ktechlab-devel] Version number of next ktechlab 0.3 release? Hi, as I'm preparing the next release, I've started thinking about the version number it should have. I'm thinking about 0.3.8, or 0.3.40. The first one is the next release after 0.3.7, released on 2009 november, while the 0.3.40 is a "big" version of 0.3 series, involving a "4" as it depends on kde4 / qt4.I don't want to give this version the 0.4 version number, because I've talked about the 0.4 KDE4 version, the big rewrite, which is a different story/codebase.Version 0.5 should be probably assigned to the first release that supports KDE5. What is your opinion? Best regards, Zoltan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
