Has this feature been implemented already? If it has, I haven't been able to find it in the docs or the CLI man pages.
We are looking for the exact opposite of this request: to taint regular nodes, so all deployments, except the ones that *require* a regular node, are automatically deployed to our preemptible nodes. On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 9:58:29 AM UTC+1, Micke Lisinge wrote: > Thanks David! > > Den måndag 21 november 2016 kl. 09:54:39 UTC+1 skrev David Oppenheimer: > Thanks for the suggestion. I think it's a reasonable suggestion and I've > filed an internal feature request to add this to gcloud, but I can't > guarantee if/when it will be implemented. > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Micke Lisinge <lis...@rabble.se> wrote: > > For sure, i'm not asking you to change the defaults. > Exactly, if you could add a "--node-taints" flag, just like the > "--node-labels" flag works to "gcloud beta container node-pools create" then > it would cover my use case. > > Den måndag 21 november 2016 kl. 01:11:28 UTC+1 skrev David Oppenheimer: > > Nodes running on preemptible VMs are labeled with > cloud.google.com/gke-preemptible=true > (see documentation here) > > > The downside of using a taint instead (or in addition) is that then users > would have to explicitly add tolerations to use these nodes. So the default > out-of-the-box behavior would be more complicated (and, for people who didn't > thoroughly read the documentation, confusing). > > > I guess we could add an option to "gcloud beta container node-pools create" > to tell GKE to add a taint in addition to a label, so users who wanted this > behavior could request it. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Micke Lisinge <lis...@rabble.se> wrote: > > With the possibility of creating preemptible node pools on GKE it would be > amazing if you could also taint these nodes, maybe even enable setting taints > for all pools just like you can label pools today. > I know taints are currently in alpha but it would be great if this could get > taken into consideration for when taints reaches beta. > > > I know this could also be solved with node affinity and anti-affinity but it > would be amazing if you would be able to taint nodes to only be used by pods > with the proper toleration. > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kubernetes-use...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to kubernet...@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kubernetes-use...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to kubernet...@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
