If it is "working as intended" then what could be the rationale that only 
DaemonSets behaves like this?

Kind regards,
Laszlo



On 07.10.2017 03:08, 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A 
wrote:
And thanks for reporting this. If it is "working as intended" it is at least 
surprising, and the behavior and rationale should be clearly documented. But it does seem 
like a bug to me.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes 
user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes... Budai Laszlo
    • Re: [k... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re... Budai Laszlo
        • ... Laszlo Budai
          • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... Laszlo Budai
              • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
                • ... Budai Laszlo
                • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
                • ... Budai Laszlo
                • ... klaus1982 . cn
                • ... klaus1982 . cn

Reply via email to