I'm trying to look at a design where I support a CRD of type "Status". "Status" is updated based on HW Events. HW Events are known to the controller side of the code. So, for "current state" I want the GETs to go to the controller.
It may require a different URI for routing , I'm ok with that, but I want to be able to bypass the etcd. On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 12:30:46 PM UTC-8, Daniel Smith wrote: > > Can you give more detail? Are you trying to serve synthetic (manufactured) > data? Should these resources support verbs other than GET? > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:05 AM, KG <gunji...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> I have a scenario where certain CRD GETs need to be serviced from >> specific controllers. I don't want to use data from etcd. Are there any >> examples I can refer to? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to kubernetes-use...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to kubernet...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
