On Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 3:29:37 AM UTC+3:30, dax....@gmail.com wrote:
> My manager is starting to look into moving us off Azure Web App into some 
> kind of container management system, either k8s or service fabric (we're 
> *mostly* a MS shop but not entirely).  I was talking with him yesterday and 
> he mentioned his plan is that each of the teams (~5-10 devs each, generally 
> one main web app and a few background jobs) in our billing group (~50 devs 
> total) would run their own cluster.
> 
> My naive understanding is that somewhat defeats the primary purpose of k8s.  
> I was imagining the the entire billing group would have a single cluster, and 
> the various teams would then not have to think about how to manage it; things 
> would "just work".  My manager's perspective is that with a big shared 
> cluster everyone would be stepping on each others toes and it would become 
> *more* difficult to manage rather than *less*.  Plus org structure is always 
> fluid and teams get reorganized into other departments etc every so often, so 
> that could be messy.  But neither of us really know.
> 
> Anyone have experience or advice on things like this?

I prefer having a big cluster separated and managed with namespaces, RBAC, QoS 
than having multiple clusters. Managing one cluster is faster than multi, it 
reduces complexity and duplication.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernete... dax . fohl
    • Re: [... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • R... Tim St. Clair
    • [kube... k1 . hedayati93
      • R... 'Suresh Visvanathan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to