I'll +1 to that. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < [email protected]> wrote:
> What if we transfer ownership of the KCC to the Kubuntu Developers? -v > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Aaron Honeycutt > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't like giving control over to the UCC even if one of our TOP > > developers is on it. Clay suggested on IRC about having a team managing > it, > > I suggest having it like before (the kinda acting leader, in that case > Jon > > but in here Philip) then we can just change ownership if someone else > takes > > that "chair" > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Valorie Zimmerman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Daniel Holbach > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > On 24.02.2016 11:25, Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > >> >> As a historic fact, the Kubuntu Community Council began before there > >> >> was a UCC. > >> >> > >> >> Can you explain what sort of bottleneck you are speaking of? Please > >> >> explain why the historical facts should be swept away so the org > chart > >> >> can be all neat and tidy? > >> > > >> > As one example, we quite often had the case where terms of board > members > >> > ended before we had replacements. In this case the owner of the team > can > >> > quickly go in and extend the term by a few weeks to make additional > >> > time. Ownership in Launchpad not only reflects a structure in an org > >> > chart, but it also comes with access privileges. > >> > > >> > As Jonathan is not involved in the Kubuntu Council anymore, I think we > >> > should move on and update Launchpad. > >> > > >> > Have a great day, > >> > Daniel > >> > >> Hello folks, I'm having another think. Daniel was friendly, and it is > >> true that Jon has moved on, and probably will not be interested in a > >> KC seat in the future. I'm CC'ing Jon so he can object if he wants. > >> > >> Scarlett is now on the UCC, and she has asked in IRC for us to > >> consider the "bus factor". If one person is the owner, and something > >> happens to them, what happens to the team? To prevent this, having > >> group ownership is the best protection, and the UCC is the logical > >> owner. So I propose a new response, as follows: > >> > >> Hello Daniel and the UCC, > >> > >> Thanks for your response. We were all taken aback by the abruptness of > >> the first request, and given the past history of the perceived > >> disregard of the KCC by the UCC, rather insulted. We all felt we were > >> being instructed to change ownership for no reason. > >> > >> Scarlett and Daniel have both now given us a reason: the bus factor > >> when a group is owned by a person. We see that that is worth > >> evaluating, and we are consulting among ourselves. > >> > >> All the best, > >> > >> Valorie > >> > >> -- > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-council > >> Post to : [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-council > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-council Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-council More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
