On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: >> That said, if we should have to re-interview I'd like to specify the >> proper procedure for this in the same meeting. Maybe someone could ask >> how other councils handle this? > > For Ubuntu Member, we'd just the button to reactivate them, I think. > I saw someone do it for sabdfl's expiration the other day :P > > I believe Dan Chen's reactivation in ~core-dev was also interview-less.
Not particularly well defined rules then :P I'd imagine something like: * if reactivation request arrives within a 2 week window -> reactivate * else reinterview This does not help when someone misreads the mail (quite frankly IIRC there are *multiple* mails, so that is a bit of a special case anyway). It however prevents us from reactivating membership of people who are no longer actual members of the community for reasons without "merit". I feel the 2 weeks rule is simple enough and yet efficient enough to not introduce overhead or anything. Also, should someone think that the 2 week window can also be abused - yes - but as generally the council can take appropriate steps in such cases, i do not think it is much of a problem. The 2 week window essentially just enables one single council member to take action without having to consult a quorumish amount of other council members ;) regards, Harald -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
