Harald Sitter <[email protected]> wrote:
>More spam, hi! > >So, I was just wondering about the uglyness of our branch naming. We >have stuff like > >~kubuntu-packagers/kdeedu/ubuntu > >Now that is an ubuntu branch of kdeedu owned by kubuntu-packagers. >Which really is not what the branch contains at all. If anything it is >the packaging of kdeedu owned by kubuntu-packagers. > >General inquiry: what do you think about moving our branches once more >into a form of: > >~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdeedu > >Advantages: >* easier scriptable in various ways as changing stuff is at the end of >the url >* easier branching (currently if you branch and forget to specify a >name or use nested branching you get a folder 'ubuntu') >* overall clearer meaning > >Disadvantages: >* yet another move >* should we ever move the same branches to full-source packaging that >would again break the sanity of the urls > >Quite honestly I myself do not have strong feelings either direction, >but clearer urls certainly would be nice. I think not messing with it further would be even nicer. I can see advantages, but I think it's not worth the trouble and confusion. Scott K -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
