On Wednesday 28 November 2012 10:55:20 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 04:29:51 PM Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 November 2012 14:46:26 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > So why isn't KDevelop included in KDE? or by KDE here you only mean > > > > the > > > > KDE SC? > > > > > > Yes it's KDE SC, the exception decision was made before the rebranding > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > And can't we use this ambiguity in our favor? > > > > I don't think I should push for any of that in any case... What I wanted > > to > > do with this thread is to find solutions, not explanations about the rules > > that drove us in such a crazy place... > > No. It was very clearly discussed to be what we now call KDE SC (KDE > support is specifically excluded, for example). As long as someone is > willing to commit to make the packages and there's an upstream commitment > to limit point release changes to bug fixes and not new features, it should > be easy to get KDevelop added. > > I'm willing to go to the tech board and ask for an exception for KDevelop as > long as someone is willing to do the packages (I don't use it regularly, so > I really couldn't test it, so I'm not the right person for that.) We have done minor releases of BlueDevil, and it is not in KDE SC... :/
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
