Dnia piątek, 22 lutego 2013 19:14:03 Aurélien Gâteau pisze: > Le Thursday 21 February 2013 09:55:32 Scott Kitterman a écrit : > > On Thursday, February 21, 2013 02:47:52 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:21:51PM +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > > > What would be the minimal screen size we need to support? I know HP > > > > Mini > > > > 1000 have 1024x576 screens [1]. Then there is the original EeePC which > > > > had a screen size of 800x480 [2]. Do we want to support such > > > > resolutions? > > > > > > the EeePC one sounds excessively small. I test it on a netbook which is > > > 1024x600. > > > > We should support 1024 X 576. Trying to support 800 X 480 would require a > > lot of redesign. Also, when I looked into it, systems that small are > > designed with local screen features that allow you pan around a larger > > display so you can manage with things designed for larger screens (i.e. > > everything). > > OK, let's define 1024x576 as the minimum resolution then. This means I can > remove some eeepc-resolution-specific code. I just filed a first merge > request for this work > (https://code.launchpad.net/~agateau/ubiquity/layout-refresh/+merge/150117) > > It's definitely not finished though. It currently looks like this: > http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-plasma-windowedh10219 > > Aurélien I like it. Aurélien, please take a look at this too: http://madsheytan.blogspot.com/2013/02/poszukiwanie-nowych-rozwiazan.html I've done some mockups on the WiFi and avatar config UI. -- Pozdrawiam, Tomasz Dudzik
şeytanDesign
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
