On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 03:07:49 PM Achim Bohnet wrote: > On Mittwoch 15 Jan 2014 14:33:32 Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Achim Bohnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Montag 13 Jan 2014 16:52:50 Scarlett Clark wrote: > > >> 1/2 Test #2: ki18n-ktranscripttest ............***Failed 0.00 sec > > >> ********* Start testing of KTranscriptTest ********* > > >> Config: Using QtTest library 5.2.0, Qt 5.2.0 > > >> FAIL! : KTranscriptTest::initTestCase() '!pluginPath.isEmpty()' > > >> returned > > >> FALSE. () > > >> > > >> Loc: [../../autotests/ktranscripttest.cpp(59)] > > >> > > >> PASS : KTranscriptTest::cleanupTestCase() > > >> Totals: 1 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped > > >> > > >> And after spending more time than I would like to admit, I have found > > >> that > > >> it is not possible for it to pass considering ki18n package is the one > > >> that > > >> provides ktranscript.so .... of course it does not exist. Once I ran > > >> the > > >> debuild skipping tests and installed the resulting package, the tests > > >> passed. This of course means this package will not make it through > > >> pbuilder. How should I proceed? > > >> pbuilder. How should I proceed? > > > > > > Hi Scarlet, > > > > > > that's IMHO an upstream bug. The test should set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or > > > whatever is used to locate ktranscript.so The test should always use > > > the > > > ktransscript.so in the source tree. Never the one that was installed > > > before. > > > > Bug report in order. > > https://bugs.kde.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=frameworks-ki18n&format=guided > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329994 > > @Scarlet: please add yourself to the CC of the bug report. > Done :) Thank you. > Achim > > > HS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
