> > (if our primary concern are low quality reviews that do not bother to > > install/upgrade, then I guess 4.12 would be the way to go :P) >
My main concern are things not working out of the box in the KDE 4.13 RC ( as is often the case with RC's as witnessed in earlier KDE SC releases ). KDE SC 4.13 will also feature a new search framework, and some applications like Amarok are likely not to be ported by that time. So we're left in the weird situation where we will have Nepomuk and Baloo on the ISO. Ofcourse, we could just drop Nepomuk from the ISO and then we leave it up to the users to install Nepomuk to get required meta data integration in Amarok. But IMHO that constitutes as loss of out of the box features from previous releases. Overall it seems a bit risky to push for a RC in a LTS release. If we're worried about support, It's not like we have a proper definition for a Kubuntu LTS release ;) Cheers Rohan Garg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
