On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, February 24, 2014 16:55:35 Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> > > ~kubuntu-members -> changed 6 months to "significant and sustained" >> > >> > >> > >> > ^ IMHO we really should have a hard value there, if 6 months seems to >> > long then perhaps 3 might be more acceptable, but I think a lot of the >> > recent candidates had a hard time knowing when exactly their >> > contirbution was sustained enough. the significance of things are hard >> > to define anyway, but one hard value seems better than a requirement >> > jellyfish. >> >> I'd prefer 3 months because I don't want to make it too hard to get >> membership, we should make it pretty easy to make people feel part of >> the gang. On the other hand I just checked Ubuntu which does say 6 >> months https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership/NewMember > > Since we are granting Ubuntu membership, I think the formal requirement needs > to be the same. My revised recommendation is we just copy from the Ubuntu > requirements and say: > >> We look for sustained and significant contributions. While there is no >> precise period that we look for, it is rare for applications to be accepted >> from people contributing for less than 6 months. > > We can decide how rare rare needs to be on a case by case basis.
Page adjusted accordingly. HS -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
