On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:42:19 Harald Sitter wrote: > foo-data (sourcename based) > vs. > libfoo1-data (library +soversion based) > vs. > libfoo-data (library without soversion based) > > on a related note... what about -dev and -dbg packages? > > personally I'd go for libfoo-data by default. if a package has > multiple libraries it should be foo-data instead though. > same goes for -dev, although I'll also argue that with multiple libs > there should either be multiple dev packages or the libs should not be > split to begin with. personally I don't see the point in splitting kio > for example. > > HS
Seems fine. I care more that we agree with Debian on this than any particular naming scheme. Scott K -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
