On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0300, Ovidiu-Florin Bogdan wrote: >> I think having a separate iso would be better. >> >> Making the packages to replace Plasma and KSC 4 would be far more >> complicated than having a separate Testing iso. >> >From what I remember, Martin said Plasma 5 cannot run besides Plasma. So >> we would need something like the neon project. >> >> But considering the existence of the neon project, would this be worth the >> effort? > > Sure it's worth the effort, we'll be switching to Plasma 5 as default > in a future release and we want to be ready at the time. > > We plan for a separate ISO which will be called Kubuntu Plasma 5 Remix > or Kubuntu Plasma 5 Tech Preview or similar. If it's practical to do > with a PPA then we'll get it built using a PPA as well which means > less issues renaming packages to make them co-exist in the archive. > > Jonathan
Having a "standard" and testing ISO will be cool. We just need really good, clear docs to ensure wide-spread testing. I'm sure the Neon experience will help the team develop what we need for the ISOs. This is really exciting. Valorie -- http://about.me/valoriez -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
