On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 18:49:24 Harald Sitter wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Rohan Garg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Feel free to air any concerns you might have over here. >> >> I still think there should be a formal bug report for the foundations >> team to investigate why we are not using CFQ by default anyway. >> >> At any rate +1 to not having shit performance on !ssds. >>
Ack. > > Additionally, this is the kind of thing that needs an FFe now, so once it's > sorted with foundations, then the release team needs a go at it. I don't see how this is a feature. It's a bug fix at the most to be honest, upstream requires CFQ at runtime instead of Deadline, and we're fixing that runtime dep. Also, I did run this past foundations a couple of months ago where I asked if there could be any issues for Kubuntu, and off the top of their head they could not think any. But as Harald mentioned, a bug should be opened for the foundations team to investigate switching back to CFQ. Cheers Rohan Garg -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
