On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Harald Sitter <[email protected]> wrote: > ahoy, > > Here's the long promised branch mail on what the branch structure > should look like in git > > We want branches per supported series to enable efficient and easy > SRUing. CI needs a consistent name scheme. > > Two possible setups present themselves one is based on delivery > targets and the other is based on versions > > # without version (respective upstream version(s) can be anything) > master > -> kubuntu/unstable > -> kubuntu/utopic/archive (5.0.0) > -> kubuntu/utopic/backports (5.1.0) > -> kubuntu/utopic/updates (5.0.1 to be landed in archive) > -> kubuntu/vfoo/archive (5.1.0) > > # with version > master > -> kubuntu/unstable > -> kubuntu/5.0.0/utopic > -> kubuntu/5.0.1/utopic > -> kubuntu/5.1.0/utopic > -> kubuntu/5.1.0/vfoo
I forgot to mention, should we want/need CI on a per-series basis they'd respectively be kubuntu/utopic/unstable -> kubuntu/utopic/backports kubuntu/utopic/stable -> kubuntu/utopic/archive -> kubuntu/utopic/updates and for version based schemes we'd simply have kubuntu/unstable/utopic kubuntu/stable/utopic (derived branches depending on the versions) HS -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
