On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Harald Sitter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Valorie Zimmerman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Harald Sitter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I had the sudden urge to do something wildly crazy so we are now doing >>> stable integration of Applications/15.04 (the kf5 based ones anyway). >>> >>> It raises the total job count of KCI to 822 :O >>> >>> Also, I have the very uneasy feeling that this is going to blow up >>> over the weekend, just so you know. >>> >>> HS >> >> Catching up on old mail. I have a question: how much of the software >> that we package (our own plus KDE) is now covered by CI? >> >> As in, a percentage, or 822 packages out of ___________? > > Impossible to say precisely. The 822 jobs are all the utopic/vivid > unstable/stable combinations we have. They are based on 190 distinct > sources. Between the three upstream release bundles we have frameworks > (67) plasma (40) apps (177). Out of those we integrate all frameworks, > plasmas as well as 83 apps sources. So we are still missing about 100 > apps that have not yet been ported to kf5. > Or in concrete terms out of the current upstream release bundles we > are integrating 190 out of 284 sources (66%). > > A pretty inaccurate query for stuff depending on kde4libs suggests 554 > *binary packages* that still depend on it. This number is including > recently ported apps (~40), so we can probably go with <=500 binary > packages that depend on kde4libs of which the majority seem to be > kdepim+extragear+calligra+brokenplasmoids, the rest is random stuff > from kde-apps or elsewhere. > Excluding the broken plasmoids we are probably at around 450 binary > packages that aren't ported to kf5. That number probably best be cut > in half to account for the inaccurate query and the fact that a lot of > sources create >=2 binary packages. So let's go with a ballpark number > of 225 (this is again including apps from before), so without those we > are at about 131 sources that we have in the archive but are not part > of one of the three upstream release bundles. > > Grand total would be approximately 190 out of 415 (284+131) sources = > 44% integrated = 225 missing. > >> Also, did it blow? > > It did not. On a related note, since the switch from lxc to docker the > rate of blowing up for load reasons has decreased by 100% (the server > still suffers from heavy breathing because of all the tarball > compression though ;)) > > HS
Harald, Is it our plan to eventually cover all the packages with CI? Is that even possible with the resources -- both human and machine -- that we have? And is it important. The work you have done so far IS important, in my opinion. Thank you a thousand times. It has cost pain and suffering along with time and cycles though. So I guess I'm asking for you to look into your crystal ball. Valorie -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
