Agreed. On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:22:52 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > FWIW, I think that's prudent. > > Scott K > > On Monday, April 18, 2016 02:32:52 PM privat wrote: > > Anyone against me answering "Short" for Kubuntu 16.04? > > > > I don't think anyone would want to run the current LTS for more than 2 > > years (still lots of WIP stuff, even if usable), and I doubt anyone of > > us will care about 16.04 much in ~2020. > > > > for reference: 14.04 is "Normal" > > > > Philip > > > > Am 18.04.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Stéphane Graber: > > > Hello, > > > > > > The request for MATE to be a 3 years LTS reminded us that we need to > > > know what flavors will be LTS and how long they intend to support it. > > > > > > The usual supports lengths are: > > > - Not LTS (9 months) > > > - Short LTS (3 years) > > > - Normal LTS (5 years) > > > > > > Please all flavor leads reply to this e-mail, picking one of those 3 > > > options. Someone on the TB will then review and confirm the request. > > > > > > This needs to happen very soon as we will need to update Launchpad to > > > set the right support length on the various packages, which means that > > > you can't produce final images until this is sorted. > > > > > > Thanks!
-- Clay Weber -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
