The ppas *I* use is staging* And backports for well backports. Do what you will for all others. Cheers Scarlett On Apr 23, 2016 19:06, "Clay Weber" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder if it is worth it to re-group our PPAs more like it used to be > done > > The kubuntu-ppa launchpad page(1) used to contain basically: > kubuntu-updates > kubuntu-backports > beta-backports > experimental > > I think it causes confusion and more, not counting possible packaging > conflicts > when a larger group of people mix and match things. > > I think it might be prudent to just stick to > kubuntu-updates > kubuntu-backports > kubuntu-experimental > > and move *all* landing and staging ppas to a different page or pages, ones > less or un-advertised. > As we have not done any KDE/Plasma beta work for some time, the > beta-backports > might not be useful anymore. Experimental might be useful to have around, > though. > > Rationale: > PPAs that are not official nor supported or possibly unstable should be > mixed in > with the PPAs we actively support and promote. I think it might make > tracking > down issues a bit easier, and make it less likely for dependency hell to > bring > its wrath. > > > Questions: > Why did we start moving PPAs to the main page? > Are there administrative actions that are worth having it as it currently > is? > > What are the negatives of separating things into different launchpad pages? > > Am I proposing something that may not be helpful to users and the team at > all? > > > (1) https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa > > -- > Clay Weber > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel >
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
