Would it be just as easy to simply change the time? More changes more often is better, for sure, just as long as they don't inhibit other work. Maybe doing 0800 or 0900 UTC would make more sense?
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Clive Johnston <[email protected]> wrote: > Some very valid points, Mon-Fri does make more sense, so +1 from me. > > On Sunday, 13 November 2016 20:46:00 GMT Rik Mills wrote: > > Currently this it set to run at midnight UTC seven days per week. > > > > On Sunday morning LP undergoes some scheduled maintenance, meaning for a > > period of 4 hrs or more the LP publisher does not run, so builds appear > > to fail with a time-out. > > > > Coupled with the facts that some of our contributors in non European > > time zones find that the nightly at the weekend clashes with times when > > they may be able to work on packaging fixes, and that the traffic of > > upstream git commits by KDE dev is very much slower at the weekend, then > > it has been suggested that at least the build at 0:00 UTC Sat > > night/Sunday morning may be worth dropping. There is also a case for > > arguing that we just set the schedule as Mon-Fri and be done with it. > > > > This would have the benefit that contributors with spare time at the > > weekend could get stuck into fixing things without the nightly build > > blocking or delaying builds triggered by their packaging changes. > > > > Obviously the nightly could be manually started if it is clear no-one is > > doing much. > > > > Opinions on the above gratefully received. > > > > Rik > > > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel > -- @wxl | polka.bike C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
