On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:49:54PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Once upon a time, the KVM/arm64 world switch was a nice, clean, lean
> and mean piece of hand-crafted assembly code. Over time, features have
> crept in, the code has become harder to maintain, and the smallest
> change is a pain to introduce. The VHE patches are a prime example of
> why this doesn't work anymore.
> 
> This series rewrites most of the existing assembly code in C, but keeps
> the existing code structure in place (most function names will look
> familiar to the reader). The biggest change is that we don't have to
> deal with a static register allocation (the compiler does it for us),
> we can easily follow structure and pointers, and only the lowest level
> is still in assembly code. Oh, and a negative diffstat.
> 
> There is still a healthy dose of inline assembly (system register
> accessors, runtime code patching), but I've tried not to make it too
> invasive. The generated code, while not exactly brilliant, doesn't
> look too shaby. I do expect a small performance degradation, but I
> believe this is something we can improve over time (my initial
> measurements don't show any obvious regression though).

I ran this through my experimental setup on m400 and got this:

BM              v4.4-rc2        v4.4-rc2-wsinc  overhead
--              --------        --------------  --------
Apache          5297.11         5243.77         101.02%
fio rand read   4354.33         4294.50         101.39%
fio rand write  2465.33         2231.33         110.49%
hackbench       17.48           19.78           113.16%
memcached       96442.69        101274.04       95.23%
TCP_MAERTS      5966.89         6029.72         98.96%
TCP_STREAM      6284.60         6351.74         98.94%
TCP_RR          15044.71        14324.03        105.03%
pbzip2 c        18.13           17.89           98.68%
pbzip2 d        11.42           11.45           100.26%
kernbench       50.13           50.28           100.30%
mysql 1         152.84          154.01          100.77%
mysql 2         98.12           98.94           100.84%
mysql 4         51.32           51.17           99.71%
mysql 8         27.31           27.70           101.42%
mysql 20        16.80           17.21           102.47%
mysql 100       13.71           14.11           102.92%
mysql 200       15.20           15.20           100.00%
mysql 400       17.16           17.16           100.00%

(you want to see this with a viewer that renders clear-text and tabs
properly)

What this tells me is that we do take a noticable hit on the
world-switch path, which shows up in the TCP_RR and hackbench workloads,
which have a high precision in their output.

Note that the memcached number is well within its variability between
individual benchmark runs, where it varies to 12% of its average in over
80% of the executions.

I don't think this is a showstopper thought, but we could consider
looking more closely at a breakdown of the world-switch path and verify
if/where we are really taking a hit.

-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to