Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> Would
>>> really prefer something at Kconfig-time, but we have no way of letting the
>>> assembler version feed into the Kconfig system (nor do we want it, I
>>> suspect).
>>>   
>>>       
>> config AS_VERSION
>>         eval as --version | awk '{ ... }'
>>     
>
>
> config time is not possible (not to mention it's not that uncommon to
> config on a different box than you compile). 

If we add the 'eval' Kconfig keyword, it becomes possible, but I guess 
it isn't worth it if there are more users and anyway split 
configure/compile, as you note, breaks it.


> Makefile side is not that
> hard; in fact what you'd need is a very small check similar to
> scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh . While that checks a gcc
> feature, checking the VMX operations via a C program with inline asm is
> actually the most realistic test ANYWAY ...
>   

The problem with that is that the test comes too late: after we've 
configured.  Andrew wants to keep allmodconfig working, and for that we 
need to deselect CONFIG_KVM before compilation starts.

gcc.*protector.sh only affects the Makefile, not the configuration, AFAICT.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to