Andrew Morton wrote: > Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we > have now and hold this off for 2.6.21? >
Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them (and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20: - kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that - this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and a generally usable system - from my testing, it's quite stable -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
