* Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 01:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > here's a quick update wrt. the KVM paravirtualization work: i'm
> > currently working on KVM/NET, which is a Linux<->Linux virtual network
> > device driver between the KVM host and the KVM guest. It uses the new
> > KVM-paravirtualization infrastructure that i've sent to this list
> > yesterday.
> >
> > while the code is still a prototype, it's working already and here are
> > some early TCP bandwidth (bw_tcp from guest to host) performance results
> > which i'm sure you'll enjoy:
>
> I assume you use kernel support in the host as well? This is exactly
> the code we should share, IMHO; Xen already has such a thing, and I'd
> prefer not to have three implementations in the kernel....
>
> Patches?
no patches yet - it's still prototype. I hope to have something to look
at tomorrow-ish. With lhype sharing ought to be possible, while Xen's
model is quite different. I agree that we dont want 3 implementations in
the kernel ...
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
