Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I still think that in the long term, we should migrate to
> new system calls and a special file system for kvm, which
> might be non-mountable. 

The inode-per-vm and inode-per-vcpu approach sort-of-implies a 
nonmountable special filesystem, so with the proposed change, we'll be 
halfway there.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to