Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I still think that in the long term, we should migrate to > new system calls and a special file system for kvm, which > might be non-mountable.
The inode-per-vm and inode-per-vcpu approach sort-of-implies a nonmountable special filesystem, so with the proposed change, we'll be halfway there. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel