Waba wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:20:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Well, there's probably an emulator bug somewhere.
>>
>> Can you add a printk() to set_cr4() in kvm_main.c and see what the guest 
>> does?  The documentation states that it's up to the OS to enable the 
>> bit, so I can't just apply the previous patch, even though it fixes the 
>> problem.
>>     
>
> set_cr4: set 0000000000000010
> set_cr4: set 0000000000000090
> set_cr4: set 0000000000000098
> set_cr4: set 00000000000000b8
>
> Here is it. If I get it right, the guest never sets 0x200 then ?
>
>   

Yes.

At this point it'll be hard going without the sources.  Perhaps you can 
reproduce this with opensolaris?


> -Waba.
>
> PS: I'll be on holidays and unable to read my mail until Thursday.
>   

We'll be waiting...  enjoy your vacation.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to