Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The bad news is that kvm-14 seems to be a lot slower than kvm-12 + > modules from kernel 2.6.20. This is the case with a GNU/kFreeBSD guest. > kvm-12 was about 1.5 time faster than qemu + kqemu. kvm-20 is slower > than qemu without kqemu... > > Does anybody have an idea about this performance regression? >
What is your workload? How are you measuring performance? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
