Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> >>>> That kills the -no-kvm switch, which allows a single binary to be >>>> used both with and without kvm. Or do you think both >>>> target-i386+kvm and target-kvm ought to be kept? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I meant here: target-i386 (with kvm support) and target-i386-kvm. >> >> target-i386 is an architecture. It can currently generate >> i386-softmmu, i386-user, x86_64-softmmu, x86_64-user. We're simply >> adding the ability to generate i386-kvm and x86_64-kvm. I'd like to >> find another name. >> >> I still want to be able to support kvm/qemu in the normal i386-softmmu. > > Thanks, that clears it up. I'll apply the patch.
Can you wait on that? I'll submit a better one tonight. It was just an RFC :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
