On 3/18/07, Dâniel Fraga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, to be honest, I think that qemu author should have > migrated to gcc4. I can't understand why someone still uses gcc3 for > development. I mean, the author could take a weekend and fix all the > code to compile with gcc4. Is it so hard? I think it's the natural order > of things. > > I think it's easier for the qemu author to port his code to > gcc4 instead of forcing the entire world to install an obsolete > compiler like gcc3 just to compile his code.
Please read this email thread if you want to know why your assumption is incorrect: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-10/msg00175.html --Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
