>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 8:13 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Managing userspace in subversion and the kernel in git is proving to be > quite a pain. Branches have to be maintained in parallel, tagging is > awkward, and bisection is fairly impossible. > > What do people think about putting libkvm and qemu into the usr > directory of the kernel repo? It's slightly wierd but will make life > generally easier.
That does sounds a little weird, though I know what you mean about managing the two disparate repos. I think having one repo makes sense, but I dont know if putting that in the kernel tree is the right direction. Is there another way? For instance, go back to using /kernel, /libkvm, and /qemu from SVN and submitting patches/drops to the kernel tree. I am not advocating SVN over GIT either...the new unified repo could be whatever. I think the most important thing is having it in one place. -Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
