Randy Thelen wrote: > Folks -- > > The instructions on getting a source tree, e.g., kvm-17 is a bit > convoluted. I know that you'd like to simplify the process from a > development standpoint (i.e., the unification mail the last couple of > days discusses this). But, could I encourage you to document the > process of getting a kvm numbered tree in a wee-bit more detail over > on the "code" page of the wiki? > > For example, we grabbed source bits out of kvm/public/17. But then > mashing those with other source bits felt more complicated than > necessary. >
I've updated the page to mention the tagging scheme used. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
