On Tue, 01 May 2007 09:43:57 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Hollis Blanchard wrote: >>> >>> I think we can start the syscall based API (with compatibility ioctls >>> for x86), now that we have all four archs looking at it. >> >> I was looking at refactoring the ioctl interface, but since we're >> dropping it then I'm glad I haven't put too much time into it. :) >> > Well, that's needed anyway. The ioctl interface isn't going away.
Maybe I misunderstood. When you said this: > I think we can start the syscall based API (with compatibility ioctls > for x86), now that we have all four archs looking at it. I thought you meant that all architectures would use the syscall interface, and x86 would only continue to support the ioctls as a legacy interface. In that case, I think kvm_main.c would basically need a rename to kvm_ioctl.c, and it would be built only for x86 so wouldn't need any portability. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
