Gregory Haskins wrote: > I was thinking about some of the issues that we are dealing with > w.r.t. signalling a sleeping userspace (eventfd, signals, etc). I was > wondering if perhaps we were looking at the problem the wrong way. Can we > perform halts in the kernel and therefore eliminate the need to signal > userspace all together? I put together a proof-of-concept patch to try out > this idea. This patch replaces the fd-signaling patch previously sent. > > Comments please. This pretty much looks like where we're heading on 390. We'll also go for a wait queue. Thumbs up.
so long, Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
