On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:16:50PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:00:42AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > > > >> On 5/22/07, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I'm not opposed to supporting emulation environments, just don't make > >>> a large pile of crap the default like Xen -- and having to integrate > >>> PCI probing code in my guest domains is a large pile of crap. > >>> > >> Exactly. I'm about to start a pretty large project here, using xen or > >> kvm, not sure. One thing for sure, we are NOT going to use anything > >> but PV devices. Full emulation is nice, but it's just plain silly if > >> you don't have to do it. And we don't have to do it. So let's get the > >> PV devices right, not try to shoehorn them into some framework like > >> PCI. > >> > > > > If you don't care about full virtualization kvm is the wrong project for > > you. You might want to take a look at lguest. > > > > > > This is incorrect. While kvm started out as a full virtualization > project, it will expand with I/O PV and core PV. Eventually most of the > paravirt_ops interface will have a kvm implementation.
The statement above was a little misworded I think. It should have been a "if you care about pure PV ..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
