>Jun Koi wrote: >> So the PCI interface is definetely better IMO. Please put it online, >> so we can test it. >Why would we want a PCI interface to do balooning? All we need is a >simple interface. It _is_ a mess for platforms that don't have PCI. >And it is a mess for paravirtulaization - will we create a virtual PCI >bus just for this?
I agree that pci interface isn't ideal, the advantage is that platforms that do support pci don't have to implement a virtualized bus, and pci is PnP device. This was the motivation behind using it, especially for Windows. Now that more platforms are joining the KVM wagon, we should define a common bus. PCI was a overkill anyway - its irq are shared and we don't have to use its io/mmio areas. Do you guys have something to start with? > >so long, >Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
