Anthony Liguori wrote:
> In debugging a virtbench bug on KVM, I seemed to uncover some weird 
> behaviors with gettimeofday() and KVM with newer kernels.
>
> The attached program will run a tight loop of code a certain number of 
> times and measure it's duration with gettimeofday().  With a stock 
> ubuntu 2.6.20-15 kernel, I see pretty reasonable behavior in the guest:
>
> ./loop 0
> 0
> ./loop 100
> 0.5
> ./loop 10000
> 0.150
> ./loop 1000000
> 0.15954
>
> Note the format is <secs>.<usecs> so it's behaving quite well.  Now, 
> with a 2.6.22-rc4 kernel, using the same kernel config (saying N to 
> all of the new features), we get:
>
> ./loop 0
> 0.16
> ./loop 100
> 0.0
> ./loop 10000
> 0.0
> ./loop 1000000
> 0.20008
>
> It's pretty erratic.  If I run if a few times at any rate, sometimes I 
> get 0.0 and sometimes I get a more sane result.

I expect the newer kernel is sometimes disqualifying the timestamp 
counter from being used as a clocksource.   Running pinned to a cpu may 
improve things.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to