Avi Kivity wrote: > > We haven't seen any issue with the 2.6.22 boot decompressor. Which of > the four (fs, gs, ldt, or tr) were proving problematic and why?
It was tr that was affecting Workstation, since we boot through normal BIOS path, and only a 16-bit task was loaded at this point. Just to make the state comprehensive, I opted to reload everything. Zach ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
