On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 07:44 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 01:01 -0700, Dor Laor wrote:
> > Instead of the above code I would call to iter_seek and do everything inside > > then return a proper error code if needed. > > Im not sure I fully understand your point. But if I do get what you are > saying that wouldn't work right for the design. iter_push and iter_pop > are special forms of iter_seek(seek_next) in that they advance the index > AND the position. iter_seek only advances the position. /me slapping myself I think I see what you are saying now. You just meant make a single function "iter_seek" which as flags for "seek_next, seek_push, and seek_pop"? Yes, that would work quite nicely and cleans things up a bit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
