--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 14:46 -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 14:41]:
> > i am very interested about the fact that it gave you false results when
> > you ran it with mem size below 0xf0000000,
> > beacuse in this case the bios patch have no effect, at least it
> > shouldnt.
>
> Agreed =) I'll let you know if I figure anything out here. I'm
> switching to your latest set of patches and starting to debug it.
>
ohh!!!
you remember in the old patch stupid:
+ if (ram_size > 0xf0000000)
> val = 640; /* base memory in K */
i bet this is was the problem :)
in the new patchs it is fixed :)
(i really have no idea how this entered to the code, probably wrong
paste ...)
> > can you try to drive memtest86 on a real physical host with more than
> > 4giga ?
>
> Yeah.
>
>
--- End Message ---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
