Rusty Russell wrote: > Partly the horror of the code, but mainly because it is an in-order > ring. You'll note that we use a reply ring, so we don't need to know > how much the other side has consumed (and it needn't do so in order). >
Yes, it's quite nice: by using two in-order rings, you get out-of-order completions. Simple _and_ efficient. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
