Yang, Sheng wrote: >> >> Wait, which lapic5 is broken and which is okay?! >> >> Can you explain? maybe post sha1 hashes? >> >> > > Sorry for not describe it clearly. > > The ordinary lapic5 branch is broken now, we can make, but running it > would result in host crash(we mostly using module). Eddie found that if > we rebase the lapic5, we can get it work. So that is what I mean Rebased > LAPIC5. >
Ah, understood. I will rebase and apply your patches. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
