Hi Mark, > On 8/25/07, Luca < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/07, Mark Bidewell < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes I did use --with-patched-kernel. > > > > Don't. You don't have a patched kernel ;-) > > > Odd I thought fedora built the appropriate modules or does this option have > another meaning?
Historically, --with-patched-kernel was for those running a -mm kernel, which was the only tree that contained the kvm patch. These days it's a bit of a misnomer. It's just a question of whether you want to use the (likely outdated) modules included in the kernel, or build from the source package. I'm sure you're kernel does include kvm modules. I think all Luca meant was that the norm is to build new modules from the source package, as they are most likely newer than those included in a kernel. Nevertheless, it seems that you should be able to build kvm-36 userspace on a recent kernel and use the modules you already have. Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
