Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 04:19, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>     
>>>> I should mention that the converting to use ->fault() is a 15-minute
>>>> change; the tricky part is adding backwards compatibility for the
>>>> external module package.
>>>>         
>>> It should be mostly possible to ifdef a nopage() handler, which is
>>> just a wrapper function to translate arguments then call your new
>>> ->fault() handler. With luck, fault would mostly inline into nopage,
>>> and do some constant folding to make it cheaper...
>>>
>>> I'm planning to go through and convert the rest of the in-tree users
>>> at some point soon, so if you do get a chance to convert your
>>> upstream code before I try, it would nice ;)
>>>       
>> In kvm I don't add compatibility #ifdefs to mainline, instead I have an
>> awk script that massages the sources into something that all kernels can
>> grok.
>>     
>
> Sure, but my suggestion is just a way to make it possible without having
> to maintain a lot of duplicated code. The point is simply that we'll be
> getting rid of nopage from mainline sooner or later, and it will probably
> be less painful for your out of tree stuff if you do it rather than me. Maybe.
>
>   

Certainly it's best done by someone familiar with the kvm external 
module hackery.  I'll do it during 2.6.24 if no one beats me to it.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to