Paul Brook wrote: >> Indeed for regular qemu this is useless. But it is useful for kqemu >> (for which there is support in mainline qemu), and for kvm (which we >> hope to merge one day). >> > > And, as discussed before, it should be asking the hypervisor what features it > supports instead of trying to guess from the cpuid output. >
Agreed. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
