Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>       We also the similar problems, when we enable kvm/ipf. You know,
> Qemu doesn't work on IPF both at host and guest sides. 
> So, we have some changes, and new-added stuffs to current Qemu code. Do
> you think which tree we should push them to?  Qemu upstream 
> or kvm-userspace?  
>   

qemu-upstream is best for changes that would benefit regular qemu. 
Changes that are only good for kvm should be in kvm-userspace.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to