Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mike Day wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>>
>> if (unlikely(vcpu->mp_state == VCPU_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED)) {
>> - printk("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>> vcpu->vcpu_id, vcpu->sipi_vector);
>>
>>
>
> I think KERN_INFO would better fit the intention of these printk()s. I
> don't really like the idea that a guest can trigger a printk() though.
> A printk() flood can potentially hide important information from the
> user and it chews disk space on /var/log. I'm somewhat inclined to
> think that we should try to avoid these in general but if we do use
> them, I think we should limit them to only printing out once per-guest.
>
> What do you think Avi?
>
This should probably be pr_debug() or something.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
