Avi Kivity wrote:
> Argument names in prototypes please.
Will do that.
>> case KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION: {
>> int ext = (long)argp;
>>
>> - switch (ext) {
>> - case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
>> - case KVM_CAP_HLT:
>> - case KVM_CAP_MMU_SHADOW_CACHE_CONTROL:
>> - case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
>> - r = 1;
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> - r = 0;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> + r = kvm_arch_check_extension(ext);
>> break;
>>
>>
>
>
> Reflecting some more, do we want different API availablility for
> different archs? We can make this generic, and ignore arch-specific
> extensions.
>
> But on the other hand, things like KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP _are_ applicable to
> powerpc, but may not be implemented from day 1... should we do
>
> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
> return KVM_ARCH_HAS_IRQCHIP;
>
> ?
Will do that too.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
